skip to Main Content

A case study reviewing European democracy support


Armenia has in some ways been a classic example of a country caught in a grey zone or hybrid regime, with its mixture of features of democratic and authoritarian systems. In concert with the rest of the Eurasian region, Armenia had been viewed in recent years as a country subject to the gradual advance of authoritarian governance. The current government led by Nikol Pashinyan is in a remarkably dominant position – similar to those that came before, albeit with significantly higher levels of public support.

The 2018 Velvet Revolution could be seen as an entirely unexpected event but it was also possible thanks to the multitude of protests in the country in recent years that received significantly less international attention. The elements of political competition within the system were vital in allowing for change. While the shadow cast by the revolution conditions any contemporary analysis of Armenian politics, it is vital to recognise that the fundamental challenges still remain the same. It is highly unlikely that democratic development will flourish without a greater dispersal of political and economic power.

The paper outlines a series of recommendations for updating and improving European efforts to support democracy in Armenia. It was commissioned by the European Partnership for Democracy in the context of a ‘Review of European democracy support’. Armenia was chosen among a series of country cases due to its geographical location (in the EU neighbourhood), ties to a major power (Russia) and the changes brought about by the 2018 revolution. The recommendations from the paper are split into four thematic areas, each containing specific recommendations. These are:

  • Strengthening the political and financial cooperation between Armenia and the EU
  • Complementing successful on-going efforts of political coordination with an increased focus on programmatic cooperation between European states
  • Developing the necessary knowledge to properly understand the fundamental drivers of political change in Armenia
  • Increasing support to non-state actors, such as independent media, political parties, parliaments and civil society


 

More news

Public Letter on the role of the European Board for Media Services
Public Letter on the role of the European Board for Media Services
What is still missing from the European Media Freedom Act
What is still missing from the European Media Freedom Act
Enhancing the integrity of the 2024 European Parliament elections
Enhancing the integrity of the 2024 European Parliament elections
How to implement the DSA so that the Political Advertising Regulation works in practice?
Democracy in Review: First Half of 2023
Call on the European Union to Secure an Effective Media Freedom Act
DD foundation
The Community is growing: DD Foundation joins the European Partnership for Democracy
Welcome to EPD’s new President Thijs Berman
Exploring a new dawn in democracy – EPD’s 2023 Annual Conference
Online political advertising
Civil Society Open Letter on the ongoing negotiations regarding the Regulation of Political Advertising
Civil Society Statement on Democratic Digital Infrastructure
Joint Civil Society and Democracy Organisations’ Priorities for the Defence of Democracy Package
Joint Civil Society and Democracy Organisations’ Priorities for the Defence of Democracy Package
Back To Top